Sharia, Constitutionalism and Public Reason: A Critical Assessment of Iran’s Post-Revolutionary Constitution
"In this speech I develop a liberal assessment of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s constitution based on John Rawls and Abdullahi An-Na‘im’s ideas of constitutionalism and public reason. After providing a historical background about the constitution, it is argued that the main type of discrimination embedded in Iran’s post-revolutionary constitution is ‘fuqaha non-fuqaha inequality’. In addition, it is argued that the unequal status between fuqaha and non-fuqaha in Iran’s constitution is problematic from both political-philosophical (in the Rawlsian sense) and legal-Islamic (in the An-Na‘imian sense) perspectives. The speech concludes by claiming that, in order to respect the ideals of political liberalism in Iran, there should be an agenda for democratic constitutional amendment."
This page updated by Research Center for International Relations on 04.08.2014 10:51:37